迁移服务器的过程中,遇到一个报错, 如下:
严重: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:168)
at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.InputRecord.readFully(InputRecord.java:422)
at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.InputRecord.read(InputRecord.java:460)
at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:863)
at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1188)
at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1215)
at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1199)
开始一直以为是Nginx长短连接的问题,全都改成长连接依然如此。由此,便把注意到SSL,是否服务器升级了版本导致SSL的版本出问题呢?
Google一篇文章,该小哥的报错跟这个一模一样,The server only supports SSLv3, and Java start at v2
,可能是Windows Server 2012只支持V3。 Blog连接地址:https://www.it1352.com/213968.html
按照教程准备禁用V3时,发现注册表并没有相关信息,注册表路径如下,regedit即可打开
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\Schannel\Protocols\SSL 3.0\Server]
"Enabled"=dword:00000000
无他,找工具测试Windows Server2012支持哪几个版本吧。
nmap小工具即可,操作连接。一直下一步,最后启动nmap即可。命令如下:
C:\Users\Administrator>nmap -p 36689 --script ssl-enum-ciphers 10.6.9.240
Starting Nmap 7.91 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2020-11-17 11:14
Nmap scan report for 10.6.9.240
Host is up (0.00s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
36689/tcp open unknown
| ssl-enum-ciphers:
| TLSv1.0:
| ciphers:
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (rsa 2048) - C
| compressors:
| NULL
| cipher preference: server
| warnings:
| 64-bit block cipher 3DES vulnerable to SWEET32 attack
| Broken cipher RC4 is deprecated by RFC 7465
| Ciphersuite uses MD5 for message integrity
| Key exchange (dh 1024) of lower strength than certificate key
| TLSv1.1:
| ciphers:
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (rsa 2048) - C
| compressors:
| NULL
| cipher preference: server
| warnings:
| 64-bit block cipher 3DES vulnerable to SWEET32 attack
| Broken cipher RC4 is deprecated by RFC 7465
| Ciphersuite uses MD5 for message integrity
| Key exchange (dh 1024) of lower strength than certificate key
| TLSv1.2:
| ciphers:
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (dh 1024) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (rsa 2048) - C
| compressors:
| NULL
| cipher preference: server
| warnings:
| 64-bit block cipher 3DES vulnerable to SWEET32 attack
| Broken cipher RC4 is deprecated by RFC 7465
| Ciphersuite uses MD5 for message integrity
| Key exchange (dh 1024) of lower strength than certificate key
|_ least strength: C
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.70 seconds
以上结果说明只使用了TLSv1.0、TLSv1.1、TLSv1.2,V2与V3都未是用。
去线上服务器做一个对比测试,线上只启用了TLSv1.0。 自闭ing~~~
C:\Users\Administrator>nmap -p 3389 --script ssl-enum-ciphers 172.20.16.2
Starting Nmap 7.91 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2020-11-17 11:26 ?
Nmap scan report for 172.20.16.2
Host is up (0.0010s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
3389/tcp open ms-wbt-server
| ssl-enum-ciphers:
| TLSv1.0:
| ciphers:
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - C
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (secp256r1) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 (rsa 2048) - C
| compressors:
| NULL
| cipher preference: server
| warnings:
| 64-bit block cipher 3DES vulnerable to SWEET32 attack
| Broken cipher RC4 is deprecated by RFC 7465
| Ciphersuite uses MD5 for message integrity
| Weak certificate signature: SHA1
|_ least strength: C
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.38 seconds
在IE浏览器中禁用1.1、1.2,重启服务器,依旧报这个错,最后只能交给开发去查看了。
默哀~~~