If the authors idea triggers a respones in your mind—such as a question, a connection between this idea and something else youve read, or an experience of your own that supports challenges what the author says—write it down and put brackets (not parentheses) around it so that you will be able to identify it as your own when you review your notes. Here is a sample research record illustrating these two steps:
如果作者的思想触发了你头脑中的一个回应，比如一个问题，或者将你在其它地方的阅读与这种思想之间发生了，或者作者所说对你的经验形成了支持或挑战——遇到这种情况，就把它写在方括号（不是圆括号）内，以便你复习笔记时能识别出它是你自己的想法。下面是一个上述方法的范例：
Adler, Mortimer J. The Great Ideas: A Lexicon of Western Thought (New Youk: Macmillan, 1992) Says that throughout the ages, from ancient Greece, philosophers have argues about whether various ideas are true. Says it`s remarkable that most renowned thinkers have agreed about what truth is — ''a correspondence between thought and reality.'' 867 Also says that Freud saw this as the scientific view of truth. Quotes Freud:"this correspondence with the real external world we call truth. It is the aim of scientific work, even when the practical value of that work does not interest us." 869 [I say true statements fit the facts; false statements do not.]
阿德勒·莫蒂默·J的《伟大的思想：西方思想辞典》（纽约麦克米伦出版社，1992）中说，从古希腊哲学家开始，对各种各样思想真实性的争论遍及各个时代。辞典中说，值得注意的是，“思想与现实是对应的”——已经受到最著名的思想家的认可。（P867页）辞典中还说，弗罗伊德是视真理为科学发现。并引用弗罗伊德说：“我们称做真理的客观的外部世界，正是科学工作的目的，甚至在我们没有兴趣时，那就是我们实践价值。”（P869）[我认为，真实的表述就是符合事实的，不真实的表述就是不符合事实的]
·························
这是与小伙伴一起，使用对赌基金阅读原版Beyond Feelings第18天的内容。
持续日译，明日再见。
