I don’t agree
Jane Nelsen, Nadine Gaudin CPDLT, Solenne Roland-Riché CPDT
Objective: Understand that it is not about who is right and wrong; it is about learning together.
Comment: Two realities can be opposed. Remember to think that the participant can believe something and you can believe something else and none of you lose any value or dignity.
Instructions:
1. Make one line of 8 people who will be the facilitators. Have one volunteer be the participant who disagrees.
2. Role play No. 1: The participant stands in front of the whole line and says in an aggressive way:” I don’t agree” to all of them. Ask all what they are thinking, feeling, and deciding as they hear the resistance.
3. Role play No. 2: Each person in the line reads an A statement to a participant who says, “I don’t agree,” in an aggressive way. Ask all what they are thinking, feeling, and deciding as they hear the resistance.
4. Role play No. 3: This time the facilitator will reply with one of the B statements to the participant saying “I don’t agree”. Ask all what they are thinking, feeling, and deciding when they hear the “learning together” statements. Ask them what this tool (learning together) will develop in the list of skills or challenges.
5. Ask what was the difference between being in opposition as an “or” and working and learning together as an “and”. You can point out if the participants haven’t: vertical/horizontal, expert/facilitator, binary/complexity…
6. Ask them what they have learnt from this activity.
Statements A
You should understand that research says that.
When you do that, it works better.
Maybe you will understand later.
You might not be ready.
Making face of disapproval. Sight and roll eyes.
No, but I think that you are wrong.
You should know better.
Oh please!
Statements B
Smile and saying “ok”
We don’t have to agree; it is what makes life interesting.
We don’t have to think the same way.
We don’t have the same idea and it doesn’t make yours or mine a bad one.
Now it gets interesting! We have different opinions.
Please tell me more; I’m not sure I understand where we disagree.
Thanks for showing us that reality is not so simple.
I haven’t thought about it enough, give me some time.我不同意
Jane Nelsen，Nadine Gaudin CPDLT，Solenne Roland-RichéCPDT
目标：明白不是谁是对错; 它是关于一起学习的。
评论：可以反对两种现实。 记住，认为参与者可以相信某些东西，你可以相信别的东西，没有人会失去任何价值或尊严。
说明：
1.让一个8人成为协调人。 让一名志愿者成为不同意的参与者。
2.第1号角色扮演：参与者站在整条线前，以激进的方式说：“我不同意”所有人。 询问所有他们的想法，感受和决定，因为他们听到了阻力。
3.角色扮演第2号：该行中的每个人都以一种积极的方式向参与者说“我不同意”。 询问所有他们的想法，感受和决定，因为他们听到了阻力。
4.角色扮演第3号：这次主持人将向参与者回复B中的一个陈述，说“我不同意”。 询问所有他们在思考，感受和决定何时听到“共同学习”的陈述。 问他们这个工具（一起学习）将在技能或挑战列表中发展出来。
5.问一下，作为一个“或”，作为一个“和”在一起工作和学习之间有什么区别。 你可以指出参与者是否没有：纵向/横向，专家/促进者，二元/复杂性......
6.询问他们从这项活动中学到了什么。
声明A.
你应该明白，研究表明这一点。
当你这样做时，它会更好。
也许你以后会明白的。
你可能还没准备好。
面对不赞成。 视线和滚动的眼睛。
不，但我认为你错了。
你应该知道的更好。
哦拜托！
声明B.
微笑着说“好”
我们不必同意; 这是让生活变得有趣的原因。
我们不必以同样的方式思考。
我们没有相同的想法，它不会使你或我的坏。
现在它变得有趣！ 我们有不同的意见。
请告诉我更多; 我不确定我明白我们不同意的地方。
感谢您向我们展示现实并非如此简单。
我没想过，给我一些时间。
